The big suites get all the attention and solve maybe half the problems. These are the tools that answer questions the popular ones cannot, and most of them are free.
Nothing else tells you what search engines actually did on your site. A log file shows which URLs were crawled, how often, with what status code, and how much crawl budget went to pages you do not care about. Screaming Frog's Log File Analyser handles this, and so does a shell pipeline on a small site:
grep -i googlebot access.log | awk '{print $7}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -30
grep -i googlebot access.log | awk '{print $9}' | sort | uniq -c # status codes
The typical finding on a mid-sized site is that a large share of bot requests go to faceted URLs, pagination or old redirects. That is crawl budget you can reclaim, and no crawler-based tool can see it.
Everyone uses the URL inspection panel one URL at a time. The API does the same thing programmatically, so you can check indexing status for a list of URLs and get back the canonical Google chose, the last crawl date, and the coverage state. There is a daily quota per property, which is enough to monitor your most important pages continuously and spot the day Google picks a different canonical from yours — the earliest signal of a duplication problem.
Free, underused, and the data has a second life now that several AI assistants draw on Bing's index. Its site scan and backlink data are usable, and the IndexNow integration lets you push URL changes directly. Even if Bing traffic is small, the crawl diagnostics catch real problems and the account takes ten minutes to verify.
Screaming Frog gives you data; Sitebulb explains it. The prioritised hints with severity and explanation are the difference between a CSV a client ignores and a document they act on. It costs less than the large SaaS suites and is a desktop crawler, so the data stays on your machine.
curl -sIL https://example.com/page shows the full redirect chain and final status in one line, which settles most "is this canonical" arguments faster than any GUI.Fetch your own pages as a bot and read what comes back. curl -sA "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)" https://example.com/page | head -100 shows the HTML a crawler receives, before JavaScript. If your content is not in there, you have a rendering dependency that no keyword tool will ever flag. This one command catches more genuine indexing problems than any audit score.